The AI Footprint ← All 277 models

MiniMax-M2.7 vs Grok 4.7

Same standard of work. About 8.2× the energy.

Use this
xAI
0.285 Wh
0.13 g CO₂·under a metre of driving
Instead of this
MiniMax
2.34 Wh
1.1 g CO₂·≈ 4 metres (14 feet) of driving

The verdict

Grok 4.7 scores higher than MiniMax-M2.7 on Epoch's Capabilities Index, 154.37 against 145.88, across 58 benchmarks covering coding, agents, long context and writing, while using about 8.2× less energy per answer. Grok 4.7 has not faced human head-to-head voting, where MiniMax-M2.7 carries 84,977 votes, worth weighing.

Side by side

Grok 4.7MiniMax-M2.7
Energy per answer0.285 Wh2.34 Wh
Carbon released0.13 g CO₂1.1 g CO₂
Same carbon as drivingunder a metre4 metres (14 feet)
Energy rank21 of 277160 of 277
Capability (58 benchmarks)154.4145.9
Human vote rating-1405
Votes cast-84,977
ConfidenceCalculatedInferred
Released2026-09-212026-03-18

What these figures are

Energy is calculated the same way for every model on this site, from public data and calibrated against laboratory measurement, accurate to roughly a factor of two to three, which is why we only ever state a difference of 5× or more. Capability is Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, one score combining 58 separate benchmarks; the vote rating comes from blind human comparisons. The full method is here.

Share this

Data built 2026-10-17 · MiniMax-M2.7 in detail · Grok 4.7 in detail · all 277 models · compare any two models yourself