The AI Footprint ← All 278 models

MiniMax-M3 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Same standard of work. About 8.4× the energy.

Use this
OpenAI
2.61 Wh
1.2 g CO₂·≈ 5 metres (16 feet) of driving
Instead of this
MiniMax
22.0 Wh
10 g CO₂·≈ 41 metres (133 feet) of driving

The verdict

GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher than MiniMax-M3 on Epoch's Capabilities Index, 156.5 against 146.87, across 58 benchmarks covering coding, agents, long context and writing, while using about 8.4× less energy per answer. In blind head-to-head voting, people rate them 1431 and 1431 respectively.

Side by side

GPT-5.6 LunaMiniMax-M3
Energy per answer2.61 Wh22.0 Wh
Carbon released1.2 g CO₂10 g CO₂
Same carbon as driving5 metres (16 feet)41 metres (133 feet)
Energy rank169 of 278250 of 278
Capability (58 benchmarks)156.5146.9
Human vote rating14311431
Votes cast41,31768,611
ConfidenceDay-one estimateCalculated
Released2026-07-092026-06-01

What these figures are

Energy is calculated the same way for every model on this site, from public data and calibrated against laboratory measurement, accurate to roughly a factor of two to three, which is why we only ever state a difference of 5× or more. Capability is Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, one score combining 58 separate benchmarks; the vote rating comes from blind human comparisons. The full method is here.

Share this

Data built 2026-10-29 · MiniMax-M3 in detail · GPT-5.6 Luna in detail · all 278 models · compare any two models yourself