The AI Footprint ← All 281 models

o3 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Same standard of work. About 6.5× the energy.

Use this
OpenAI
2.61 Wh
1.2 g CO₂·≈ 5 metres (16 feet) of driving
Instead of this
OpenAI
17.0 Wh
7.8 g CO₂·≈ 31 metres (103 feet) of driving

The verdict

GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher than o3 on Epoch's Capabilities Index, 156.67 against 146.86, across 58 benchmarks covering coding, agents, long context and writing, while using about 6.5× less energy per answer. In blind head-to-head voting, people rate them 1431 and 1410 respectively.

Side by side

GPT-5.6 Lunao3
Energy per answer2.61 Wh17.0 Wh
Carbon released1.2 g CO₂7.8 g CO₂
Same carbon as driving5 metres (16 feet)31 metres (103 feet)
Energy rank170 of 281239 of 281
Capability (58 benchmarks)156.7146.9
Human vote rating14311410
Votes cast41,31758,901
ConfidenceDay-one estimateInferred
Released2026-07-092025-04-16

What these figures are

Energy is calculated the same way for every model on this site, from public data and calibrated against laboratory measurement, accurate to roughly a factor of two to three, which is why we only ever state a difference of 5× or more. Capability is Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, one score combining 58 separate benchmarks; the vote rating comes from blind human comparisons. The full method is here.

Share this

Data built 2026-10-31 · o3 in detail · GPT-5.6 Luna in detail · all 281 models · compare any two models yourself