Z.ai (Zhipu AI) +1 · released 2025-08-03
GLM-4.5 uses about 0.248 Wh of electricity to answer a typical question. A long, complex answer costs about 23× more, at 5.79 Wh. That places it 183 of 266 among the models we can measure, and every figure here is calculated the same way as every other model.
23,712 people have voted on it in blind head-to-head comparisons on LMArena, giving it a rating of 1430. This is the only figure here that measures whether anyone actually prefers the answers, rather than how the model scores on a test. Broken down, people rate it 1434 on coding, 1395 on creative writing, 1404 on following instructions.
Calculated Calculated from a published parameter count. Every model on this site is calculated the same way, so the comparison holds even where the absolute value carries uncertainty. Our figures are good to roughly a factor of two to three, which is why we only ever state a difference of 5× or more.
Energy cannot be worked out without knowing how big a model is. Of the 2 models from Z.ai (Zhipu AI) +1 that we track, 2 can be assessed at all — the rest publish too little for anyone outside the company to calculate anything.
Capability and the roster come from Epoch AI, whose Capabilities Index is the 58-benchmark composite quoted above. Energy is calculated with EcoLogits and calibrated against laboratory measurements from ML.ENERGY. Human preference comes from LMArena. All four are public and free; the full method is here.
These figures are published under CC BY 4.0 — use them anywhere, including commercially, with credit to The AI Footprint.
Compare GLM-4.5 with another model